Hi Damo, Could you please respond to Ferruh's question?
Regards,
Kalesh
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:33 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@xilinx.com>
wrote:
> On 6/15/2022 3:56 PM, Kalesh A P wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Damodharam Ammepalli <damodharam.ammep...@broadcom.com>
> >
> > Currently, we fail the init/probe of pmd if eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues
> > or eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues is 0. We are removing this check.
> >
>
> Is there a valid usecase for Rx only or Tx only config?
> I assume testpmd doesn't support it, how are you testing this?
>
> > Fixes: daef48efe5e5 ("net/bnxt: support set MTU")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Damodharam Ammepalli <damodharam.ammep...@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.ko...@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 7 +------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> > index 34f2149..8181e1f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> > @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static int bnxt_alloc_prev_ring_stats(struct bnxt
> *bp)
> > sizeof(struct
> bnxt_ring_stats) *
> > bp->tx_cp_nr_rings,
> > 0);
> > - if (bp->prev_tx_ring_stats == NULL)
> > + if (bp->tx_cp_nr_rings > 0 && bp->prev_tx_ring_stats == NULL)
> > goto error;
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1567,11 +1567,6 @@ int bnxt_dev_start_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> > int vlan_mask = 0;
> > int rc, retry_cnt = BNXT_IF_CHANGE_RETRY_COUNT;
> >
> > - if (!eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues ||
> !eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues) {
> > - PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Queues are not configured yet!\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (bp->rx_cp_nr_rings > RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS)
> > PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
> > "RxQ cnt %d > RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS
> %d\n",
> > --
> > 2.10.1
> >
>
>
--
Regards,
Kalesh A P
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
