Hi David, >-----Original Message----- >From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> >Sent: Friday, June 10, 2022 6:42 PM >To: Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>; Ankur Dwivedi ><adwiv...@marvell.com> >Cc: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Ferruh Yigit ><ferruh.yi...@xilinx.com>; dpdk stable <sta...@dpdk.org>; dev ><dev@dpdk.org>; Akhil Goyal <gak...@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob >Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com> >Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 01/12] common/cpt: fix build with GCC 12 > >External Email > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Hello maintainers, > >On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:17 PM David Marchand ><david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> GCC 12 raises the following warning: >> >> In function ‘fill_sg_comp_from_iov’, >> inlined from ‘cpt_kasumi_enc_prep’ at >> ../drivers/common/cpt/cpt_ucode.h:2176:8, >> inlined from ‘cpt_fc_enc_hmac_prep’ at >> ../drivers/common/cpt/cpt_ucode.h:2475:3, >> inlined from ‘fill_digest_params’ at >> ../drivers/common/cpt/cpt_ucode.h:3548:14, >> inlined from ‘otx_cpt_enq_single_sym’ at >> ../drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c:541:9, >> inlined from ‘otx_cpt_enq_single_sym_sessless’ at >> ../drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c:584:8, >> inlined from ‘otx_cpt_enq_single’ at >> ../drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c:611:11, >> inlined from ‘otx_cpt_pkt_enqueue’ at >> ../drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c:643:9, >> inlined from ‘otx_cpt_enqueue_sym’ at >> ../drivers/crypto/octeontx/otx_cryptodev_ops.c:668:9: >> ../drivers/common/cpt/cpt_ucode.h:415:36: error: array subscript 0 is >> outside array bounds of ‘buf_ptr_t[0]’ {aka ‘struct buf_ptr[]’} >> [-Werror=array-bounds] >> 415 | e_dma_addr = bufs[j].dma_addr; >> | ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> ../drivers/common/cpt/cpt_ucode.h:416:48: error: array subscript 0 is >> outside array bounds of ‘buf_ptr_t[0]’ {aka ‘struct buf_ptr[]’} >> [-Werror=array-bounds] >> 416 | e_len = (size > bufs[j].size) ? >> | ~~~~~~~^~~~~ >> >> For now, waive this warning until we have a proper fix. > >Both common/cpt and crypto/cnxk have the same code that triggers this >warning. >Can you look into this please?
We will look into the issues in common/cpt and crypto/cnxk. > >Thanks. > >-- >David Marchand Regards, Ankur