On 5/24/22 23:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
24/05/2022 22:06, David Marchand:+ count = 0; + for (i = 0; builtin_ctx[i] != NULL; i++, count++) + ; + TAILQ_FOREACH(c, &driver_commands_head, next) { + for (i = 0; c->commands[i].ctx != NULL; i++, count++) + ; + }Just a personal preference: the iterator "i" is incremented inside the "for" instructions, but I would have incremented "count" as a statement of the loops.
Since I dislike loops with empty body as well, I'll change it on applying.
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> Thanks
Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <[email protected]>
