24/05/2022 22:06, David Marchand:
> +     count = 0;
> +     for (i = 0; builtin_ctx[i] != NULL; i++, count++)
> +             ;
> +     TAILQ_FOREACH(c, &driver_commands_head, next) {
> +             for (i = 0; c->commands[i].ctx != NULL; i++, count++)
> +                     ;
> +     }

Just a personal preference:
the iterator "i" is incremented inside the "for" instructions,
but I would have incremented "count" as a statement of the loops.

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>

Thanks


Reply via email to