Hi Arek, > Hi Akhil, > > Sorry I have missed that, and I think we should revert this patch. > It would make sense to have TLS derived numbers for these curves if DH and > ECDH would be in the same op. > But since we decided to split it we are going to go with separate structs for > x448 > and x25519 as per: > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220531040439.15862-7-arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com/
I have asked you previously also to update patchworks with superseded When you are sending new versions or if the patch is not valid. I will remove this patch from the tree, since the patch is not pulled in main. But please take care in future.
