On 12/04/2022 09:58, Jiang, YuX wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 6:22 PM
To: sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>;
Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
<benjamin.wal...@intel.com>; David Christensen
<d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; hariprasad.govindhara...@intel.com; Hemant
Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>;
Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
<john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>;
Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>;
Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q...@intel.com>;
Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
<tho...@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen,
Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com>
Subject: 21.11.1 patches review and test

Hi all,

Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.1.

Please try and complete validation by April 13th.

Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any
issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and
reported validations will be added to the release notes.

A release candidate tarball can be found at:

     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.1-rc1

These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/

Thanks.

Kevin

---

Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.1-rc1 test rate is 
90%. Till now, no critical issue is found.
Failure defect:
Bug1: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=992 [dpdk 21.11.1-rc1] 
drivers/net/cnxk/cnxk_ethdev_mtr meson build failed with cflag param 
optimization=1 on Ubuntu20.04 with GCC10.3
  > It was found in 22.03-rc2(https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939), 
validation team apply 939's patch failed. Need new patch for LTS21.11.1-rc1.


Thanks for reporting this. I couldn't reproduce but sent a patch and updated the Bz. Please try it out if you can.

Kevin.

# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* Build&CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest 
GCC/Clang/ICC version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora35, 
RHEL8.4, etc.
- All test done. Find new bug: Bug1, not fix.
* PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum 
offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum 
offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.                
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.    
* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow 
Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
- All test done. No new dpdk issue is found.
* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single 
core performance test, etc.
- All test done. No big performance drop.
* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - 
QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
- All test passed.
* Power: test scenarios including bi-direction/Telemetry/Empty Poll 
Lib/Priority Base Frequency, etc.
- All test passed.
                
# Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as 
PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing/VMAWARE 
ESXI 7.0u3, etc.
- All test done. No new issue is found.
* Cryptodev:
*Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev 
ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
- Test rate: 80%, no new issue is found currently.
*Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance /Cryptodev 
Latency, etc.
- Test rate: 80%, no new issue is found currently.

BRs
Yu Jiang

Reply via email to