Hi Qi,
Thank you for your reply and confirmation.

Regards,
Navin Srinivas

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 7:04 AM Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]> wrote:

> We need a separate fix for AVF which is ongoing.
>
> And DPDK 20.11.4 LTS by default will only backport all the fix that during
> DPDK 21.11 dev cycle, so you may need to wait for 20.11.5 or just cherry
> pick by yourself.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Qi
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Navin Srinivas <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 25, 2022 2:00 AM
> *To:* Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming <
> [email protected]>; [email protected]; Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix function pointer in
> multi-process
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Whether this fix is applicable for VF? I do not see this change ported to
> VF in DPDK-20.11.4.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Navin Srinivas
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 8:58 AM Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:56 AM
> > To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z
> > <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; Yu, DapengX
> > <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > Subject: [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix function pointer in multi-process
> >
> > From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
> >
> > This patch uses the index value to call the function, instead of the
> function
> > pointer assignment to save the selection of Receive Flex Descriptor
> profile ID.
> >
> > Otherwise the secondary process will run with wrong function address from
> > primary process.
> >
> > Fixes: 7a340b0b4e03 ("net/ice: refactor Rx FlexiMD handling")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Haiyue Wang <[email protected]>
>
> Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
>
> Thanks
> Qi
>
>

Reply via email to