We need a separate fix for AVF which is ongoing.
And DPDK 20.11.4 LTS by default will only backport all the fix that during DPDK 
21.11 dev cycle, so you may need to wait for 20.11.5 or just cherry pick by 
yourself.

Regards
Qi


From: Navin Srinivas <g.navinsrini...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 2:00 AM
To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Cc: Yu, DapengX <dapengx...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com>; 
dev@dpdk.org; Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.w...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix function pointer in 
multi-process

Hi,

Whether this fix is applicable for VF? I do not see this change ported to VF in 
DPDK-20.11.4.

Thanks,
Navin Srinivas

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 8:58 AM Zhang, Qi Z 
<qi.z.zh...@intel.com<mailto:qi.z.zh...@intel.com>> wrote:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yu, DapengX <dapengx...@intel.com<mailto:dapengx...@intel.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:56 AM
> To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com<mailto:qiming.y...@intel.com>>; 
> Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zh...@intel.com<mailto:qi.z.zh...@intel.com>>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Wang, Haiyue 
> <haiyue.w...@intel.com<mailto:haiyue.w...@intel.com>>; Yu, DapengX
> <dapengx...@intel.com<mailto:dapengx...@intel.com>>; 
> sta...@dpdk.org<mailto:sta...@dpdk.org>
> Subject: [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix function pointer in multi-process
>
> From: Dapeng Yu <dapengx...@intel.com<mailto:dapengx...@intel.com>>
>
> This patch uses the index value to call the function, instead of the function
> pointer assignment to save the selection of Receive Flex Descriptor profile 
> ID.
>
> Otherwise the secondary process will run with wrong function address from
> primary process.
>
> Fixes: 7a340b0b4e03 ("net/ice: refactor Rx FlexiMD handling")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org<mailto:sta...@dpdk.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Yu <dapengx...@intel.com<mailto:dapengx...@intel.com>>
> Acked-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.w...@intel.com<mailto:haiyue.w...@intel.com>>

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks
Qi

Reply via email to