> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 3:08 PM
> To: Power, Ciara <ciara.po...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: gak...@marvell.com; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] crypto: fix asymmetric private session variable size
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Power, Ciara <ciara.po...@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 12:58 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>; gak...@marvell.com;
> > Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>; Power, Ciara
> > <ciara.po...@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] crypto: fix asymmetric private session variable size
> >
> > When creating the asymmetric session mempool, the maximum private
> > session size of all devices is used when creating the mempool object
> > size.
> > The return value for ``rte_cryptodev_asym_get_private_session_size``
> > is unsigned int, whereas the variable was uint8_t, leading to a
> > possible overflow issue.
> >
> > To fix this, the variable for private session size is now changed to
> > unsigned int to match the function return type.
> >
> > Fixes: 1f1e4b7cbaad ("cryptodev: use single mempool for asymmetric
> > session")
> > Reported-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ciara Power <ciara.po...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c index 727d271fb9..d262ae6ffa 100644
> > --- a/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > +++ b/lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> > @@ -1810,7 +1810,8 @@ rte_cryptodev_asym_session_pool_create(const
> > char *name, uint32_t nb_elts,
> > struct rte_mempool *mp;
> > struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session_pool_private_data *pool_priv;
> > uint32_t obj_sz, obj_sz_aligned;
> > - uint8_t dev_id, priv_sz, max_priv_sz = 0;
> > + uint8_t dev_id;
> > + unsigned int priv_sz, max_priv_sz = 0;
> >
> > for (dev_id = 0; dev_id < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; dev_id++)
> > if (rte_cryptodev_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> Looks like the variable type of unsigned int is match the return type. So
> Acked-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>
Acked-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
