> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ghalem Boudour <ghalem.boud...@6wind.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 5:04 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ghalem Boudour <ghalem.boud...@6wind.com>;
> Thibaut Collet <thibaut.col...@6wind.com>; Olivier Matz
> <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/iavf: initialize large VF setting at startup
> 
> lv_enabled is used to remember if large VF setting is configured, but its 
> value
> is not initialized at startup. This can lead to a different configuration
> regarding the initial configuration of the PF.
> For example, a first start is done with 8 rx and 8 tx queues. Large VF is not
> needed and reta size is 64.
> A second start is done with 20 rx and tx queues. Large VF is required and reta
> size is 256.
> A third start is done with 2 rx and tx queues. Large VF is not needed but reta
> size is 256 as the PF has been configured during the second start.
> 
> In order to have a consistent behavior regarding reta size whatever the
> configuration of the PF (may be changed by a previous boot) the lv_enabled
> must be set properly at the init phase.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ghalem Boudour <ghalem.boud...@6wind.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thibaut Collet <thibaut.col...@6wind.com>
> Reviewed-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
> index 79397f15e54f..09410be4b712 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
> @@ -2276,6 +2276,8 @@ iavf_init_vf(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>                       PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "unable to allocate rss_lut
> memory");
>                       goto err_rss;
>               }
> +             if (vf->vsi_res->num_queue_pairs >
> IAVF_MAX_NUM_QUEUES_DFLT)
> +                     vf->lv_enabled = true;

Why you put this operation in the part of " VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_RSS_PF"?

>       }
> 
>       if (vf->vf_res->vf_cap_flags &
> VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_RX_FLEX_DESC) {
> --
> 2.30.2

Reply via email to