On 11/5/2021 4:03 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/2/2021 12:50 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
The problem is solved using Rx metadata delivery negotiation API [1].
[1] commit f6d8a6d3fad7 ("ethdev: negotiate delivery of packet metadata from HW to
PMD")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index 4366015b01..ec5073908f 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
@@ -69,14 +69,6 @@ Deprecation Notices
and the related structures (``rte_fdir_*`` and ``rte_eth_fdir_*``),
will be removed in DPDK 20.11.
-* ethdev: New offload flags ``RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_FLOW_MARK`` will be added in
19.11.
- This will allow application to enable or disable PMDs from updating
- ``rte_mbuf::hash::fdir``.
- This scheme will allow PMDs to avoid writes to ``rte_mbuf`` fields on Rx and
- thereby improve Rx performance if application wishes do so.
- In 19.11 PMDs will still update the field even when the offload is not
- enabled.
-
* ethdev: Announce moving from dedicated modify function for each field,
to using the general ``rte_flow_modify_field`` action.
+ Pavan, who added the deprecation notice at first place, plus people who ack'ed
the patch are cc'ed.
Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
Pavan, Jerin, Hemant, Konstantin, any objection to remove the deprecation
notice?
