On 11/2/21 4:47 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/2/2021 12:50 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
The problem is solved using Rx metadata delivery negotiation API [1].


Can this API replace RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH too?

It can, but it should not. RSS hash is an offload since it is a
calculation of the hash in HW and delivery of the result to SW.
Like checksums: check in HW and delivery of the result to SW.


[1] commit f6d8a6d3fad7 ("ethdev: negotiate delivery of packet metadata from HW to PMD")

Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
---
  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 8 --------
  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index 4366015b01..ec5073908f 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
@@ -69,14 +69,6 @@ Deprecation Notices
    and the related structures (``rte_fdir_*`` and ``rte_eth_fdir_*``),
    will be removed in DPDK 20.11.
-* ethdev: New offload flags ``RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_FLOW_MARK`` will be added in 19.11.
-  This will allow application to enable or disable PMDs from updating
-  ``rte_mbuf::hash::fdir``.
-  This scheme will allow PMDs to avoid writes to ``rte_mbuf`` fields on Rx and
-  thereby improve Rx performance if application wishes do so.
-  In 19.11 PMDs will still update the field even when the offload is not
-  enabled.
-
  * ethdev: Announce moving from dedicated modify function for each field,
    to using the general ``rte_flow_modify_field`` action.


Reply via email to