On 11/10/2021 1:54 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/10/2021 7:48 AM, Apeksha Gupta wrote:
This patch adds Rx/Tx queue configuration setup operations.
On packet reception the respective BD Ring status bit is set
which is then used for packet processing.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Saxena <sachin.sax...@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Apeksha Gupta <apeksha.gu...@nxp.com>

<...>

+
+    rte_write32(rte_cpu_to_le_32(fep->bd_addr_p_t[queue_idx]),

Isn't 'fep->bd_addr_p_t[]' a 64-bit value?

<...>

+
+    rte_write32(rte_cpu_to_le_32(fep->bd_addr_p_r[queue_idx]),

Isn't 'fep->bd_addr_p_r[]' a 64-bit address, why doing endianness operation
only on 32-bit and writing only 32-bit of it to register?

Hi Apeksha,

Above comments seems not addressed in v10 & v11, unfortunately this keep 
happening
in this set.

Above lines are causing a build error for gcc12, can you please check:
../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c:482:9: error: array subscript 1 is above 
array bounds of ‘uint32_t[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[1]’} [-Werror=array-bounds]
  482 |         rte_write32(rte_cpu_to_le_32(fep->bd_addr_p_r[queue_idx]),
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  483 |                 (uint8_t *)fep->hw_baseaddr_v + 
ENETFEC_RD_START(queue_idx));
      |                 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c:18:
../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.h:114:33: note: while referencing 
‘bd_addr_p_r’
  114 |         uint32_t                bd_addr_p_r[ENETFEC_MAX_Q];
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c:482:9: error: array subscript 2 is above 
array bounds of ‘uint32_t[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[1]’} [-Werror=array-bounds]
  482 |         rte_write32(rte_cpu_to_le_32(fep->bd_addr_p_r[queue_idx]),
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  483 |                 (uint8_t *)fep->hw_baseaddr_v + 
ENETFEC_RD_START(queue_idx));
      |                 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c:18:
../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.h:114:33: note: while referencing 
‘bd_addr_p_r’
  114 |         uint32_t                bd_addr_p_r[ENETFEC_MAX_Q];
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~


Reply via email to