> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 16:38:37 +0000
> "Walsh, Conor" <conor.wa...@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Would something along the lines of this make more sense?
> >
> > #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_VMXNET3_DEBUG_TX
> > completed += vmxnet3_unmap_pkt(tcd->txdIdx, txq);
> > #else
> > vmxnet3_unmap_pkt(tcd->txdIdx, txq);
> > #endif
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
> 
> Why not just
>       RTE_USED(completed);
> 
> #ifdef's introduce more testing issues.

That makes more sense, I'll change it to that in v2.

Thanks,
Conor.

Reply via email to