<snip>

> 
> Convert rte_atomic_test_and_set usage to compiler atomic CAS operation for
> display sync.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.k...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> ---
>  app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_common.h     |  2 +-
>  app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_cyclecount.c | 10 +++++++---
> app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_throughput.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_verify.c     |  6 ++++--
>  4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_common.h b/app/test-
> compress-perf/comp_perf_test_common.h
> index 72705c6a2b..d039e5a29a 100644
> --- a/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_common.h
> +++ b/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_common.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ struct cperf_mem_resources {
>       uint16_t qp_id;
>       uint8_t lcore_id;
> 
> -     rte_atomic16_t print_info_once;
> +     uint16_t print_info_once;
> 
>       uint32_t total_bufs;
>       uint8_t *compressed_data;
> diff --git a/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_cyclecount.c b/app/test-
> compress-perf/comp_perf_test_cyclecount.c
> index 55559a7d5a..e002e53bdf 100644
> --- a/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_cyclecount.c
> +++ b/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_cyclecount.c
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ cperf_cyclecount_test_runner(void *test_ctx)
>       struct cperf_cyclecount_ctx *ctx = test_ctx;
>       struct comp_test_data *test_data = ctx->ver.options;
>       uint32_t lcore = rte_lcore_id();
> -     static rte_atomic16_t display_once = RTE_ATOMIC16_INIT(0);
> +     static uint16_t display_once;
>       static rte_spinlock_t print_spinlock;
>       int i;
> 
> @@ -488,10 +488,12 @@ cperf_cyclecount_test_runner(void *test_ctx)
> 
>       ctx->ver.mem.lcore_id = lcore;
> 
> +     uint16_t exp = 0;
>       /*
>        * printing information about current compression thread
>        */
> -     if (rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&ctx->ver.mem.print_info_once))
> +     if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&ctx->ver.mem.print_info_once,
> &exp,
> +                             1, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED,
> __ATOMIC_RELAXED))
>               printf("    lcore: %u,"
>                               " driver name: %s,"
>                               " device name: %s,"
> @@ -547,8 +549,10 @@ cperf_cyclecount_test_runner(void *test_ctx)
>       duration_setup_per_op = ctx->duration_op /
>                       (ctx->ver.mem.total_bufs * test_data->num_iter);
> 
> +     exp = 0;
>       /* R E P O R T processing */
> -     if (rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&display_once)) {
> +     if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&display_once, &exp, 1, 0,
> +                     __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
I think we can re-organize the current code which will avoid using atomic 
operations on 'display_once'. How about the following code?

rte_spinlock_lock(&print_spinlock);
if (display_once != 1) {
        display_once = 1;
        printf("\nLegend for the table\n".....
        <all other printfs>
}
printf....
printf....
printf....
rte_spinlock_unlock(&print_spinlock);

Rest of the changes look fine.

> 
>               rte_spinlock_lock(&print_spinlock);
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_throughput.c b/app/test-
> compress-perf/comp_perf_test_throughput.c
> index 13922b658c..f587ad2ec3 100644
> --- a/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_throughput.c
> +++ b/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_throughput.c
> @@ -329,15 +329,18 @@ cperf_throughput_test_runner(void *test_ctx)
>       struct cperf_benchmark_ctx *ctx = test_ctx;
>       struct comp_test_data *test_data = ctx->ver.options;
>       uint32_t lcore = rte_lcore_id();
> -     static rte_atomic16_t display_once = RTE_ATOMIC16_INIT(0);
> +     static uint16_t display_once;
>       int i, ret = EXIT_SUCCESS;
> 
>       ctx->ver.mem.lcore_id = lcore;
> 
> +     uint16_t exp = 0;
>       /*
>        * printing information about current compression thread
>        */
> -     if (rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&ctx->ver.mem.print_info_once))
> +     if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&ctx->ver.mem.print_info_once,
> &exp,
> +                             1, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED,
> __ATOMIC_RELAXED))
> +
>               printf("    lcore: %u,"
>                               " driver name: %s,"
>                               " device name: %s,"
> @@ -391,7 +394,9 @@ cperf_throughput_test_runner(void *test_ctx)
>       ctx->decomp_gbps = rte_get_tsc_hz() / ctx->decomp_tsc_byte * 8 /
>                       1000000000;
> 
> -     if (rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&display_once)) {
> +     exp = 0;
> +     if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&display_once, &exp, 1, 0,
> +                             __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
>               printf("\n%12s%6s%12s%17s%15s%16s\n",
>                       "lcore id", "Level", "Comp size", "Comp ratio [%]",
>                       "Comp [Gbps]", "Decomp [Gbps]");
> diff --git a/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_verify.c b/app/test-
> compress-perf/comp_perf_test_verify.c
> index 5e13257b79..6a2497985b 100644
> --- a/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_verify.c
> +++ b/app/test-compress-perf/comp_perf_test_verify.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ cperf_verify_test_runner(void *test_ctx)
>       struct cperf_verify_ctx *ctx = test_ctx;
>       struct comp_test_data *test_data = ctx->options;
>       int ret = EXIT_SUCCESS;
> -     static rte_atomic16_t display_once = RTE_ATOMIC16_INIT(0);
> +     static uint16_t display_once;
>       uint32_t lcore = rte_lcore_id();
> 
>       ctx->mem.lcore_id = lcore;
> @@ -428,7 +428,9 @@ cperf_verify_test_runner(void *test_ctx)
>                       test_data->input_data_sz * 100;
> 
>       if (!ctx->silent) {
> -             if (rte_atomic16_test_and_set(&display_once)) {
> +             uint16_t exp = 0;
> +             if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&display_once, &exp, 1,
> 0,
> +                             __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
>                       printf("%12s%6s%12s%17s\n",
>                           "lcore id", "Level", "Comp size", "Comp ratio [%]");
>               }
> --
> 2.17.1

Reply via email to