> > Yes this series initiated the issue, applying both the patch and the series > now > > On next-crypto > > It means a patch of this series broke compilation, and this fix here > should be squashed in it. Actually no, this is definitely an issue introduced earlier and should be part of stable. This got highlighted here as STATS_INTERVAL ifdef was removed in this series. The compilation is broken when STATS_INTEVAL is defined in the app.
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix build error Radu Nicolau
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix buil... Thomas Monjalon
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix poten... Radu Nicolau
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/ipsec-secgw: f... Thomas Monjalon
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] examples/... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] examp... David Marchand
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stable] [P... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stabl... David Marchand
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [dpdk-s... Akhil Goyal