On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:59 PM Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> wrote: > >> IMHO, spamming of testpmd logs in described case should be fixed > >> in testpmd itself to avoid logs in the case of ENOTSUP. That's it. > > > > I think we should not call this API in testpmd > > if not doing rte_flow transfer rule. > > > > Since testpmd does not pursue top flow insertion rate etc, > I tend to agree. For debugging purposes (testpmd main goal) > the best way is to pick proxy just before usage without any > caching etc.
+1. -- David Marchand
