27/10/2021 11:00, Ivan Malov:
> There are PMDs which do not support flow offloads at all.
> In such cases, the API in question returns ENOTSUP. This
> is too loud. Restructure the code to avoid spamming logs.
> 
> Fixes: 1179f05cc9a0 ("ethdev: query proxy port to manage transfer flows")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@oktetlabs.ru>
> ---
> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> @@ -1335,10 +1335,7 @@ rte_flow_pick_transfer_proxy(uint16_t port_id, 
> uint16_t *proxy_port_id,
>       const struct rte_flow_ops *ops = rte_flow_ops_get(port_id, error);
>       struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
>  
> -     if (unlikely(ops == NULL))
> -             return -rte_errno;
> -
> -     if (ops->pick_transfer_proxy == NULL) {
> +     if (ops == NULL || ops->pick_transfer_proxy == NULL) {
>               *proxy_port_id = port_id;
>               return 0;
>       }

I prefer this logic.
You could add a comment to say that the current port is the default.

There is also this logic in testpmd:

    port->flow_transfer_proxy = port_id;
    if (!is_proc_primary())
        return;

Could we manage secondary process case inside the API?

One more comment, for testpmd,
we are calling rte_flow_pick_transfer_proxy even if we do not config any 
transfer flow.
It is called always in init_config_port_offloads().
It looks wrong. Can we call it only when needed?

Thanks


Reply via email to