On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:57:50PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at > intel.com > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > Right, but then there's "ivshmem" that doesn't fit that description > > either > > > AFAICS. > > > > Ah, yes, forgotten about that one! :-) > > > Well, this is out of scope, but this config file should not exist in the > first place. > From my point of view, the ivshmem implementation is just badly hooked into > the eal, and this is the only reason why ivshmem should have a build option > (disabled) by default. > > If we could cleanup this, then there would be no exception to the naming > convention. > No objections here! :-)
> > -- > David Marchand
