On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com > wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Right, but then there's "ivshmem" that doesn't fit that description > either > > AFAICS. > > Ah, yes, forgotten about that one! :-) Well, this is out of scope, but this config file should not exist in the first place. >From my point of view, the ivshmem implementation is just badly hooked into the eal, and this is the only reason why ivshmem should have a build option (disabled) by default. If we could cleanup this, then there would be no exception to the naming convention. -- David Marchand
