<snip>
>
> On 10/13/21 2:07 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:57 AM Andrew Rybchenko
> > <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> wrote:
> >>
> >> Use correct define as a name array size.
> >>
> >> The change breaks ABI and therefore cannot be backported to stable
> >> branches.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 38c9817ee1d8 ("mempool: adjust name size in related data
> >> types")
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> >
> > Good catch, I guess we can clean ring too, quick grep:
> >
> > lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h-struct rte_ring {
> > lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h- /*
> > lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h: * Note: this field kept the
> > RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE size due to ABI
> > lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h- * compatibility requirements, it
> > could be changed to RTE_RING_NAMESIZE
> > lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h: * next time the ABI changes
> > lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h- */
> > lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h- char name[RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE]
> > __rte_cache_aligned;
> >
> >
>
> Yes. I've not bothered to grep... Cc maintainers.
>
> @David, @Konstantin, or @Honnappa, will you send a patch or should I do?
I will send a patch
