Hi Ferruh,
I apologise: there was a defect in v6. I re-submitted the series (v7):
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=19571
Thank you.
On 12/10/2021 21:08, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 10/5/2021 4:56 PM, Ivan Malov wrote:
Detect the flag in Rx prefix and pass it to users.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amore...@xilinx.com>
<...>
@@ -407,6 +409,15 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_prefix_to_offloads(const struct
sfc_ef100_rxq *rxq,
ESF_GZ_RX_PREFIX_RSS_HASH);
}
+ if (rxq->flags & SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_FLAG) {
+ uint32_t user_flag;
+
+ user_flag = EFX_OWORD_FIELD(rx_prefix[0],
+ ESF_GZ_RX_PREFIX_USER_FLAG);
+ if (user_flag != 0)
+ ol_flags |= PKT_RX_FDIR;
+ }
+
Hi Ivan,
This cause a build error after another sfc patch merged into next-net [1].
Following change [2] seems fixing the issue, but to be sure nothing is
missed
can you please send a new version rebasing on top of latest next-net?
[1]
Commit d86c6ced8732 ("net/sfc: use xword type for EF100 Rx prefix")
[2]
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
index 704c62c0ac90..8237b772f151 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_prefix_to_offloads(const struct
sfc_ef100_rxq *rxq,
if (rxq->flags & SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_FLAG) {
uint32_t user_flag;
- user_flag = EFX_OWORD_FIELD(rx_prefix[0],
+ user_flag = EFX_XWORD_FIELD(rx_prefix[0],
ESF_GZ_RX_PREFIX_USER_FLAG);
if (user_flag != 0)
ol_flags |= PKT_RX_FDIR;
--
Ivan M
