On 10/5/2021 4:56 PM, Ivan Malov wrote:
Detect the flag in Rx prefix and pass it to users.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amore...@xilinx.com>

<...>

@@ -407,6 +409,15 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_prefix_to_offloads(const struct sfc_ef100_rxq 
*rxq,
                                              ESF_GZ_RX_PREFIX_RSS_HASH);
        }
+ if (rxq->flags & SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_FLAG) {
+               uint32_t user_flag;
+
+               user_flag = EFX_OWORD_FIELD(rx_prefix[0],
+                                           ESF_GZ_RX_PREFIX_USER_FLAG);
+               if (user_flag != 0)
+                       ol_flags |= PKT_RX_FDIR;
+       }
+

Hi Ivan,

This cause a build error after another sfc patch merged into next-net [1].
Following change [2] seems fixing the issue, but to be sure nothing is missed
can you please send a new version rebasing on top of latest next-net?


[1]
Commit d86c6ced8732 ("net/sfc: use xword type for EF100 Rx prefix")

[2]
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
index 704c62c0ac90..8237b772f151 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_prefix_to_offloads(const struct sfc_ef100_rxq 
*rxq,
        if (rxq->flags & SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_FLAG) {
                uint32_t user_flag;
- user_flag = EFX_OWORD_FIELD(rx_prefix[0],
+               user_flag = EFX_XWORD_FIELD(rx_prefix[0],
                                            ESF_GZ_RX_PREFIX_USER_FLAG);
                if (user_flag != 0)
                        ol_flags |= PKT_RX_FDIR;

Reply via email to