Hi Linconln,
I have this patch set 100042 - build/ppc: enable build support for Power10
https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/100042
Thanks,
Thinh Tran
On 10/11/2021 9:42 AM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote:
Hi Thinh, The CI won't automatically go back and retest failures after a
patch was applied. This is a corner case, where a bad change was merged
and affected all patches downstream of that merge. We can retrigger
specific patches, just ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi Thinh,
The CI won't automatically go back and retest failures after a patch was
applied. This is a corner case, where a bad change was merged and
affected all patches downstream of that merge. We can retrigger
specific patches, just let us know the patch number or the URI of the
patch(es).
Cheers,
Lincoln
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:39 AM Thinh Tran <thin...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
<mailto:thin...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how or when the CI would re-pick up the patches those
were
failed due to this issue?
Regards,
Thinh Tran
On 10/6/2021 10:40 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> Hi Ferruh, David and Aman:
>
> Sorry for late response due to PRC holiday.
> I have just tested the patch and there is no issue be
detected for functions
> Thank you so much for the help!
>
> Regards
> Qi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com
<mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 5:46 AM
>> To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylav...@iol.unh.edu
<mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>>; dev <dev@dpdk.org
<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>>; Yang, Qiming
>> <qiming.y...@intel.com <mailto:qiming.y...@intel.com>>; Zhang,
Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com <mailto:qi.z.zh...@intel.com>>
>> Cc: c...@dpdk.org <mailto:c...@dpdk.org>; Aaron Conole
<acon...@redhat.com <mailto:acon...@redhat.com>>; dpdklab
>> <dpdk...@iol.unh.edu <mailto:dpdk...@iol.unh.edu>>; Singh, Aman
Deep <aman.deep.si...@intel.com <mailto:aman.deep.si...@intel.com>>;
>> David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com
<mailto:david.march...@redhat.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RHEL7 failures
>>
>> On 10/5/2021 8:09 PM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote:
>>> Hello Qiming and Qi,
>>>
>>> The CI is picking up failures when building on RHEL7, where
warnings
>>> are being treated as errors. This looks like something has been
>>> merged into the mainline, as it's failing across all patches.
>>>
>>> Here is the specific failure:
>>>
>>> ./drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function '_hv_bit_sel':
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:201:2: error: dereferencing
>>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
>>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
>>> d64 = *(u64 *)&b[0];
>>> ^
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function
'_reg_bit_sel':
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:458:2: error: dereferencing
>>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
>>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
>>> d32 = *(u32 *)&v[0];
>>> ^
>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>>
>>> You can download a full set of logs from here (for a failing run):
>>> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19162/
<https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19162/>
>>>
>>
>> Issue was reported by David, Aman sent the fix [1] and it is
already merged by
>> David [2], it should be fixed now, can you please double check?
>>
>> [1]
>>
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211005115754.34117-1-aman
<https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211005115754.34117-1-aman>
>> .deep.si...@intel.com/ <http://deep.si...@intel.com/>
>>
>> [2]
>>
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=16b809d144dc2df7f31695b5abc64a809
<https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=16b809d144dc2df7f31695b5abc64a809>
>> 021b154
--
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylav...@iol.unh.edu <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>
https://www.iol.unh.edu <https://www.iol.unh.edu>
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
<https://www.iol.unh.edu>
