On 9/17/2021 2:08 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote: > Hi, Ferruh, > What is the status of this set of your patches ? > Could they be merged? >
Hi Connor, I should send a new version of it, will do soon. > > 在 2021/7/22 22:43, Stephen Hemminger 写道: >> On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:15:04 +0300 >> Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> wrote: >> >>>> I don't think we care about type of transmission in this level, I assume we >>>> define min MTU mainly for the HW limitation and configuration. That is why >>>> it >>>> makes sense to me to use Ethernet frame lenght limitation (not IPv4 one). >>> >>> +1 >> >> Also it is important that DPDK follow the conventions of other software >> such as Linux and BSD. Cisco and Juniper already disagree about whether >> header should be included in what is defined as MTU; i.e Cisco says 1514 >> and Juniper says 1500. >> . >>
