14/09/2021 18:11, Ajit Khaparde: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:53 AM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 03/09/2021 17:35, Ferruh Yigit: > > > On 9/3/2021 12:50 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 02/09/2021 18:33, Ferruh Yigit: > > > >> On 8/26/2021 11:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > >>> +* Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed. > > > >>> + > > > >>> +rc3 > > > >>> +~~~ > > > >>> + > > > >>> +* Priority: applications. No application feature should be accepted > > > >>> after -rc3. > > > >>> +* New functionality that does not depend on libraries update > > > >>> + can be integrated as part of -rc3. > > > >>> +* The application change must include documentation in the relevant > > > >>> .rst files > > > >>> + (application-specific and release notes if significant). > > > >>> +* Libraries and drivers cleanup are allowed. > > > >>> +* Small driver reworks. > > > >>> +* Critical and minor bug fixes. > > > >> > > > >> As mentioned before, my concern is this may create false impression > > > >> that bugs > > > >> are fixed only in this phase. What about remove this line completely > > > >> and update > > > >> below -rc4 one as 'Critical bug fixes only.'? I think that makes > > > >> intention more > > > >> clear. > > > > > > > > I had added in -rc2: "Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed." > > > > Do you want to remove it as well? > > > > > > I think we can keep it, good to highlight one of the major tasks for -rc2 > > > is to > > > fix defects found in -rc1, and it doesn't limit fixes to ones found in > > > -rc1. > > > > Actually I think it is better to remove. > > It looks weird to have it only in -rc2. > I see you have sent the new version and it is looking really good. > > We can mention that bug fixes are welcome at any point in the cycle,
I hope it is obvious. > but priority will be given to critical fixes close to the release date. Yes it says critical bug fixes only.
