03/09/2021 17:35, Ferruh Yigit: > On 9/3/2021 12:50 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 02/09/2021 18:33, Ferruh Yigit: > >> On 8/26/2021 11:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> +* Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed. > >>> + > >>> +rc3 > >>> +~~~ > >>> + > >>> +* Priority: applications. No application feature should be accepted > >>> after -rc3. > >>> +* New functionality that does not depend on libraries update > >>> + can be integrated as part of -rc3. > >>> +* The application change must include documentation in the relevant .rst > >>> files > >>> + (application-specific and release notes if significant). > >>> +* Libraries and drivers cleanup are allowed. > >>> +* Small driver reworks. > >>> +* Critical and minor bug fixes. > >> > >> As mentioned before, my concern is this may create false impression that > >> bugs > >> are fixed only in this phase. What about remove this line completely and > >> update > >> below -rc4 one as 'Critical bug fixes only.'? I think that makes intention > >> more > >> clear. > > > > I had added in -rc2: "Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed." > > Do you want to remove it as well? > > I think we can keep it, good to highlight one of the major tasks for -rc2 is > to > fix defects found in -rc1, and it doesn't limit fixes to ones found in -rc1.
Actually I think it is better to remove. It looks weird to have it only in -rc2.
