23/08/2021 18:27, Radha Mohan: > > MAINTAINERS | 6 - > > doc/guides/rawdevs/index.rst | 1 - > > doc/guides/rawdevs/octeontx2_ep.rst | 82 --- > > drivers/raw/meson.build | 1 - > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/meson.build | 11 - > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.c | 846 ---------------------- > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.h | 52 -- > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.c | 362 --------- > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.h | 499 ------------- > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_test.c | 172 ----- > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_vf.c | 475 ------------ > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_vf.h | 10 - > > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/version.map | 3 - > > 13 files changed, 2520 deletions(-)
I see you missed updating the section "Removed Items" of the current release notes. > hi Thomas, > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-August/211681.html doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_08.rst:207:unknown document: ../rawdevs/octeontx2_dma > This time it's failing in building release notes guide for 19.08 where > this driver was introduced first. It is failing on octeontx2_dma but should fail on octeontx2_ep in 20.02. > Wouldn't release notes be built for current ? No we have all release notes, and all are generated and published on dpdk.org. > It would be odd to remove something from old release notes. I suggest a simple fix in the old 20.02 release notes: You can simply remove this line: See the :doc:`../rawdevs/octeontx2_ep` for more details on this new PMD. Or if you want to keep it for completeness, you can replace the link with a raw text ``rawdevs/octeontx2_ep``.