On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 8:51 PM Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rad...@marvell.com> wrote: > > Removing the rawdev based octeontx2-ep driver as the dependent > common/octeontx2 will soon be going away. Moreover this driver is no > longer required as the net/octeontx_ep driver is sufficient. > > Signed-off-by: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rad...@marvell.com> > --- > Changes from v3: > Fixed patch application failure due to conflict on main branch. > > > Changes from v2: > Fixed DPDK CI reported issues for more documentation failure. > > Changes from v1: > Fixed compilation issues in documentation > > MAINTAINERS | 6 - > doc/guides/rawdevs/index.rst | 1 - > doc/guides/rawdevs/octeontx2_ep.rst | 82 --- > drivers/raw/meson.build | 1 - > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/meson.build | 11 - > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.c | 846 ---------------------- > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.h | 52 -- > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.c | 362 --------- > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.h | 499 ------------- > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_test.c | 172 ----- > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_vf.c | 475 ------------ > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_vf.h | 10 - > drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/version.map | 3 - > 13 files changed, 2520 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 doc/guides/rawdevs/octeontx2_ep.rst > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/meson.build > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.c > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_enqdeq.h > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.c > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_rawdev.h > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_test.c > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_vf.c > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/otx2_ep_vf.h > delete mode 100644 drivers/raw/octeontx2_ep/version.map >
hi Thomas, http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-August/211681.html This time it's failing in building release notes guide for 19.08 where this driver was introduced first. Wouldn't release notes be built for current ? It would be odd to remove something from old release notes. regards, Radha Mohan
