On 8/16/2021 7:12 PM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote: > > On 8/2/2021 1:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 02/08/2021 03:51, Min Hu (Connor): >>> 在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道: >>>> 在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道: >>>>> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor): >>>>>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道: >>>>>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor): >>>>>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd. >>>>>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd >>>>>>>> processes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * the primary process: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \ >>>>>>>> --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * the secondary process: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \ >>>>>>>> --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humi...@huawei.com> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <ouli...@huawei.com> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> >>>>>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun...@intel.com> >>>>>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> >>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> V16: >>>>>>>> * revert unrelated changes. >>>>>>>> * add some restrictions in doc. >>>>>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, Thomas, >>>>>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by". >>>>>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her, >>>>>> please check it out, thanks. >>>>> Andrew's comment from v15: >>>>> " >>>>> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to >>>>> consider is a start point to be applied. >>>>> " >>>> Hi, Andrew, Thomos, >>>> What is the least thing should be done for this patch to >>>> meet the state sufficient to be applied? >>> Hi, all, >>> How about this patch, could it be applied? >> I was not confident enough to apply it in 21.08. >> When others will be back, we'll discuss it again for 21.11. >> > For 21.11 release. > > Acked-by: Aman Deep Singh <aman.deep.si...@intel.com> >
Hi Connor, Can you please rebase it to latest dpdk (v21.11-rc0) so we can proceed with it? I am for getting the patch as early as possible in the release cycle, specially before it is getting busy for -rc1. Thanks, ferruh
