02/08/2021 03:51, Min Hu (Connor): > 在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道: > > 在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道: > >> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor): > >>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道: > >>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor): > >>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd. > >>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd > >>>>> processes: > >>>>> > >>>>> * the primary process: > >>>>> > >>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \ > >>>>> --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0 > >>>>> > >>>>> * the secondary process: > >>>>> > >>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \ > >>>>> --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humi...@huawei.com> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <ouli...@huawei.com> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> > >>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun...@intel.com> > >>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> V16: > >>>>> * revert unrelated changes. > >>>>> * add some restrictions in doc. > >>>> > >>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08. > >>>> > >>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed. > >>>> > >>> Hi, Thomas, > >>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by". > >>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her, > >>> please check it out, thanks. > >> > >> Andrew's comment from v15: > >> " > >> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to > >> consider is a start point to be applied. > >> " > > Hi, Andrew, Thomos, > > What is the least thing should be done for this patch to > > meet the state sufficient to be applied? > Hi, all, > How about this patch, could it be applied?
I was not confident enough to apply it in 21.08. When others will be back, we'll discuss it again for 21.11.
