21/06/2021 17:54, Thierry Herbelot:
> On 6/21/21 5:44 PM, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> > From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbe...@6wind.com>
> >> On 6/17/21 9:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>>> Check Bucket key for all possible indices.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fixes: d0a00966618ba ("table: add exact match SWX table")
> >>>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >>>>> Cc: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbe...@6wind.com>
> >>> [...]
> >>>>> - return (!bkt->sig[0] && !bkt->sig[1] && !bkt->sig[2] &&
> >>>>> !bkt->sig[2])
> >>>>> + return (!bkt->sig[0] && !bkt->sig[1] && !bkt->sig[2] &&
> >>>>> !bkt->sig[3])
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thierry, thanks again, you could have actually added my ack from V1 :)
> >>>
> >>> The root cause looks to be a typo indeed,
> >>> but the impact or the scope of the issue
> >>> should stated in few words in the title please.
> >>> No need to send a v3, please suggest a title and I will apply.
> >>
> >> table: check a bucket is empty for all bucket keys
> >>
> >> Thierry
> >>
> >
> > Hi Thierry,
> >
> > I think Thomas is asking for you to send a new version of this patch with
> > the title updated. Is this OK with you?
No need to send a v3.
>
> Hello Cristian
>
> Sure !
>
> What do you think of this title:
>
> "table: check a bucket is empty for all bucket keys"
This title suggests it was not the intent before.
It should say that it fixes this check,
or better, name the area of the API which is fixed.
