On 4/25/2021 9:03 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote: > Remove port representor in device probe process. >
It can be good to highlight that is because port representor is not supported by the driver. > Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawe...@trustnetic.com> > --- > drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c | 21 ++------------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c > b/drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c > index 87c041c2ec..afb25fb8a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c > +++ b/drivers/net/txgbe/txgbe_ethdev.c > @@ -930,32 +930,15 @@ static int > eth_txgbe_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv __rte_unused, > struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev) > { > - struct rte_eth_dev *pf_ethdev; > - struct rte_eth_devargs eth_da; > int retval; > > - if (pci_dev->device.devargs) { > - retval = rte_eth_devargs_parse(pci_dev->device.devargs->args, > - ð_da); > - if (retval) > - return retval; > - } else { > - memset(ð_da, 0, sizeof(eth_da)); > - } > - > retval = rte_eth_dev_create(&pci_dev->device, pci_dev->device.name, > sizeof(struct txgbe_adapter), > eth_dev_pci_specific_init, pci_dev, > eth_txgbe_dev_init, NULL); > > - if (retval || eth_da.nb_representor_ports < 1) > + if (retval) > return retval; > - if (eth_da.type != RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_VF) > - return -ENOTSUP; > - > - pf_ethdev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(pci_dev->device.name); > - if (pf_ethdev == NULL) > - return -ENODEV; > After patch it becomes: if (retval) return retval; return 0; Why not just "return retval"? Or even can eliminate the 'retval' variable. > return 0; > } > @@ -966,7 +949,7 @@ static int eth_txgbe_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device > *pci_dev) > > ethdev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(pci_dev->device.name); > if (!ethdev) > - return -ENODEV; > + return 0; > > return rte_eth_dev_destroy(ethdev, eth_txgbe_dev_uninit); > } >