Hi Lingyu,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Liu, Lingyu
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 10:17 AM
> To: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; NBU-Contact-
> Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; david.march...@redhat.com;
> Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: support eCPRI hardware
> packet type
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> This new packet type will be used by iavf driver to map ECPRI
> hardware packet.
> This is the patch which will use this new hardware packet type.
> http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210420083817.10741-3-
> lingyu....@intel.com/
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Lingyu Liu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
> > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 10:25 PM
> > To: Liu, Lingyu <lingyu....@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>;
> > tho...@monjalon.net; david.march...@redhat.com; Hemant Agrawal
> > <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mbuf: support eCPRI hardware packet type
> >
> > Hi Lingyu,
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 09:25:31AM +0000, Lingyu Liu wrote:
> > > Add L2_ETHER_ECPRI and L4_UDP_TUNNEL_ECPRI in RTE_PTYPE.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lingyu Liu <lingyu....@intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
> >
> > The number of available packet types for tunnels is quite low
> (already
> > mentionned in this thread [1]).
> >
> > [1]
> > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210408081720.23314-
> 3-
> > ktejas...@marvell.com
> >
> > Can you give some details about how it will be used? For instance,
> > which driver will set it, which kind of application will use it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Olivier
> >
> > > ---
> > > V2 change:
> > > - refine commit log
> > >
> > > app/test-pmd/util.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> > > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.c | 2 ++
> > > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/util.c b/app/test-pmd/util.c index
> > > a9e431a8b2..494ebbf909 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-pmd/util.c
> > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/util.c
> > > @@ -258,16 +258,23 @@ dump_pkt_burst(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t
> > queue, struct rte_mbuf *pkts[],
> > > udp_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(mb,
> > > struct rte_udp_hdr *,
> > > l2_len + l3_len);
> > > - l4_len = sizeof(struct rte_udp_hdr);
> > > - vxlan_hdr =
> rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(mb,
> > > - struct rte_vxlan_hdr *,
> > > - l2_len + l3_len + l4_len);
> > > udp_port = RTE_BE_TO_CPU_16(udp_hdr-
> > >dst_port);
> > > - vx_vni = rte_be_to_cpu_32(vxlan_hdr-
> > >vx_vni);
> > > - MKDUMPSTR(print_buf, buf_size,
> cur_len,
> > > - " - VXLAN packet: packet
> type =%d, "
> > > - "Destination UDP port =%d,
> VNI
> > = %d",
> > > - packet_type, udp_port,
> vx_vni >> 8);
> > > + l4_len = sizeof(struct rte_udp_hdr);
> > > + if
> (RTE_ETH_IS_ECPRI_HDR(packet_type)) {
> > > + MKDUMPSTR(print_buf,
> buf_size,
> > cur_len,
> > > + " - eCPRI packet:
> > > + packet type
> > =%d, "
> > > + "Destination UDP
> port =%d",
> > > + packet_type,
> udp_port);
> > > + } else {
> > > + vxlan_hdr =
> > rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(mb,
> > > + struct rte_vxlan_hdr *,
> > > + l2_len + l3_len + l4_len);
> > > + vx_vni =
> > rte_be_to_cpu_32(vxlan_hdr->vx_vni);
> > > + MKDUMPSTR(print_buf,
> buf_size,
> > cur_len,
> > > + " - VXLAN packet:
> > > + packet
> > type =%d, "
> > > + "Destination UDP
> port
> > > + =%d,
> > VNI = %d",
> > > + packet_type,
> udp_port,
> > vx_vni >> 8);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > > }
> > > MKDUMPSTR(print_buf, buf_size, cur_len, diff --git
> > > a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.c
> > > b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.c
> > > index d6f906b06c..2bf97c89c6 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.c
> > > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ const char *rte_get_ptype_l2_name(uint32_t
> ptype)
> > > case RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_PPPOE: return "L2_ETHER_PPPOE";
> > > case RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_FCOE: return "L2_ETHER_FCOE";
> > > case RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_MPLS: return "L2_ETHER_MPLS";
> > > + case RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_ECPRI: return "L2_ETHER_ECPRI";
> > > default: return "L2_UNKNOWN";
> > > }
> > > }
> > > @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ const char *rte_get_ptype_tunnel_name(uint32_t
> > ptype)
> > > case RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_VXLAN_GPE: return "TUNNEL_VXLAN_GPE";
> > > case RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_MPLS_IN_UDP: return
> > "TUNNEL_MPLS_IN_UDP";
> > > case RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_MPLS_IN_GRE: return
> > "TUNNEL_MPLS_IN_GRE";
> > > + case RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_ECPRI: return "TUNNEL_ECPRI";
> > > default: return "TUNNEL_UNKNOWN";
> > > }
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h
> > > b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h
> > > index 17a2dd3576..5fdf369ac0 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h
> > > @@ -144,6 +144,13 @@ extern "C" {
> > > * <'ether type'=[0x8847|0x8848]>
> > > */
> > > #define RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_MPLS 0x0000000a
> > > +/**
> > > + * eCPRI (extend Common Public Radio Interface) packet type.
> > > + *
> > > + * Packet format:
> > > + * <'ether type'=[0xAEFE]>
> > > + */
> > > +#define RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_ECPRI 0x0000000b
> > > /**
> > > * Mask of layer 2 packet types.
> > > * It is used for outer packet for tunneling cases.
> > > @@ -491,6 +498,19 @@ extern "C" {
> > > * | 'destination port'=6635>
> > > */
> > > #define RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_MPLS_IN_UDP 0x0000d000
> > > +/**
> > > + * ECPRI packet type.
> > > + *
> > > + * Packet format:
> > > + * <'ether type'=0x0800
> > > + * | 'version'=4, 'protocol'=17,
> > > + * | 'destination port'=5123>
> > > + * or,
> > > + * <'ether type'=0x86DD
> > > + * | 'version'=6, 'protocol'=17,
> > > + * | 'destination port'=5123>
> > > + */
> > > +#define RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_ECPRI 0x0000e000
Could you help to point out in which specification or other documentation that
the destination port is specified?
I couldn't find it.
eCPRI over UDP is supported in O-RAN standards, marked as "optional" in the
specs. Are the destination ports are specified during initialization but not a
fixed value with 5123?
> > > /**
> > > * Mask of tunneling packet types.
> > > */
> > > @@ -688,6 +708,8 @@ extern "C" {
> > > RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_MASK |
> \
> > > RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_MASK))
> > >
> > > +/* Check if it is a ECPRI packet */ #define
> > > +RTE_ETH_IS_ECPRI_HDR(ptype) ((ptype) &
> > > +RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_ECPRI)
It is a bit wired. To my understanding, eCPRI is not a tunnel type like VxLAN /
GTP-U, etc. Did I miss something?
Why it is considered a tunnel?
> > > /**
> > > * Get the name of the l2 packet type
> > > *
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
BR. Bing
