On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:11 PM Conor Walsh <conor.wa...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> The IPv6 subnets used were not within the 2001:200::/48 subnet
{{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 0},
{{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 1},
etc...
Err... all those subnets were exactly == 2001:200::/48.
Is the issue that the example needs *separate* subnets taken from
within 2001:200::/48 ?
> Changed to 2001:200:0:{0-7}::/64 where 0-7 is the port ID
>
> Fixes: 37afe381bde4 ("examples/l3fwd: use reserved IP addresses")
And this looks like a Cc: sta...@dpdk.org candidate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Walsh <conor.wa...@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medved...@intel.com>
--
David Marchand
