<snip>
> >
> > The IPv6 subnets used were not within the 2001:200::/48 subnet
>
> {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 0},
> {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 1},
> etc...
>
> Err... all those subnets were exactly == 2001:200::/48.
> Is the issue that the example needs *separate* subnets taken from
> within 2001:200::/48 ?
Hi David,
As it is ATM any IP with that range will match for all the rules for the 8
ports and the application cannot differentiate between them and it just returns
the traffic to sender.
After this change the ports can be individually matched using the smaller /64
ranges for each port which are still within the given /48 subnet range
(RFC5180).
>
>
> > Changed to 2001:200:0:{0-7}::/64 where 0-7 is the port ID
> >
> > Fixes: 37afe381bde4 ("examples/l3fwd: use reserved IP addresses")
>
> And this looks like a Cc: sta...@dpdk.org candidate.
I can send a v8 and CC stable if you think that’s needed.
Thanks,
Conor.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Walsh <conor.wa...@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medved...@intel.com>
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
