09/04/2021 11:08, David Marchand: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 5:55 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > > 24/03/2021 11:32, David Marchand: > > > Add a log message when registering log types and changing log levels. > > [...] > > > + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "%s logtype level changed from %s to > > > %s\n", > > > > I would prefer "foo log level changed" > > instead of "foo logtype level changed". > > Opinions? > > No objection for me. > > > > > > > + rte_logs.dynamic_types[type].name == NULL ? > > > + "" : rte_logs.dynamic_types[type].name, > > > > In which case the logtype name is undefined? > > The logtype name is strdup(). > When registering static logtypes, this could fail, and we log the > level change at this point. > > The other path would be to call rte_log_set_level() on those static > logtypes (there is also the case of the holes in the static logtypes, > but if users are using them, it sounds like a hack). > > > If it is unexexpected, should we have "unknown" instead of ""? > > We could still register a "unknown" logtype, and then it would be odd :-). > Empty is clear to me.
OK Anyway it is unlikely.