Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Ajit Khaparde <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 11:16 AM > To: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > Cc: Bing Zhao <[email protected]>; Andrew Rybchenko > <[email protected]>; Ori Kam <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce action context APIs > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:48 AM Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > 06/04/2021 11:07, Bing Zhao: > > > Hi Thomas and Andrew, > > > > > > From: Andrew Rybchenko <[email protected]> > > > > On 3/17/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > 17/03/2021 08:59, Bing Zhao: > > > > >> The new functions rte_flow_action_ctx* that were added will > > > > replace > > > > >> the curret shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. > > > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_create > > > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_destroy > > > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_update > > > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_query > > > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_create > > > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_destroy > > > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_update > > > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_query > > > > >> > > > > >> When creating a action context, it could be shared among > > > > different > > > > >> flows or different ports. Or it could also be used by a > single > > > > flow. > > > > >> The name "shared" is improper in a sense. > > > > > > > > > > Is it the only reason for the change? > > > > > I better understand "shared" even if it is sometimes not > shared. > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > In another email, I explained the change a bit more. Please > check and give comments, thank you all. > > > > Any link to this email from inbox.dpdk.org? > > I don't see the RFC/patch even on patchwork or inbox. > Can you send a link to the mail/patch which initiated the discussion? >
Please refer to these two: http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/mn2pr12mb2909fe144aadf25350c4cbffd0...@mn2pr12mb2909.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/mn2pr12mb29097fe55676d5d389d86c46d0...@mn2pr12mb2909.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/ > > > > Please explain here the naming reason. > > > >
