06/04/2021 11:07, Bing Zhao: > Hi Thomas and Andrew, > > From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> > > On 3/17/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 17/03/2021 08:59, Bing Zhao: > > >> The new functions rte_flow_action_ctx* that were added will > > replace > > >> the curret shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_create > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_destroy > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_update > > >> - rte_flow_shared_action_query > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_create > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_destroy > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_update > > >> + rte_flow_action_ctx_query > > >> > > >> When creating a action context, it could be shared among > > different > > >> flows or different ports. Or it could also be used by a single > > flow. > > >> The name "shared" is improper in a sense. > > > > > > Is it the only reason for the change? > > > I better understand "shared" even if it is sometimes not shared. > > > > +1 > > In another email, I explained the change a bit more. Please check and give > comments, thank you all.
Any link to this email from inbox.dpdk.org? Please explain here the naming reason.
