> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yong Liu
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 12:38 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app test: fix eal --no-huge option should work
> with -m option
>
> From: Marvin Liu <yong.liu at intel.com>
>
> '--no-huge' option now can workable with -m option.
> Unit test for eal flag should change pass criterion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu at intel.com>
>
Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c index
> 0352f87..e6f7035 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> @@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ test_no_hpet_flag(void) }
>
> /*
> - * Test that the app runs with --no-huge and doesn't run when either
> - * -m or --socket-mem are specified with --no-huge.
> + * Test that the app runs with --no-huge and doesn't run when
> + --socket-mem are
> + * specified with --no-huge.
> */
> static int
> test_no_huge_flag(void)
> @@ -778,8 +778,8 @@ test_no_huge_flag(void)
> printf("Error - process did not run ok with --no-huge flag\n");
> return -1;
> }
> - if (launch_proc(argv2) == 0) {
> - printf("Error - process run ok with --no-huge and -m flags\n");
> + if (launch_proc(argv2) != 0) {
> + printf("Error - process did not run ok with --no-huge and -m
> +flags\n");
> return -1;
> }
> #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP
> --
> 1.9.3
