From: Marvin Liu <yong....@intel.com> '--no-huge' option now can workable with -m option. Unit test for eal flag should change pass criterion.
Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu at intel.com> diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c index 0352f87..e6f7035 100644 --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c @@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ test_no_hpet_flag(void) } /* - * Test that the app runs with --no-huge and doesn't run when either - * -m or --socket-mem are specified with --no-huge. + * Test that the app runs with --no-huge and doesn't run when --socket-mem are + * specified with --no-huge. */ static int test_no_huge_flag(void) @@ -778,8 +778,8 @@ test_no_huge_flag(void) printf("Error - process did not run ok with --no-huge flag\n"); return -1; } - if (launch_proc(argv2) == 0) { - printf("Error - process run ok with --no-huge and -m flags\n"); + if (launch_proc(argv2) != 0) { + printf("Error - process did not run ok with --no-huge and -m flags\n"); return -1; } #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP -- 1.9.3