From: Marvin Liu <yong....@intel.com>

'--no-huge' option now can workable with -m option.
Unit test for eal flag should change pass criterion.

Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu at intel.com>

diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
index 0352f87..e6f7035 100644
--- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
+++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
@@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ test_no_hpet_flag(void)
 }

 /*
- * Test that the app runs with --no-huge and doesn't run when either
- * -m or --socket-mem are specified with --no-huge.
+ * Test that the app runs with --no-huge and doesn't run when --socket-mem are
+ * specified with --no-huge.
  */
 static int
 test_no_huge_flag(void)
@@ -778,8 +778,8 @@ test_no_huge_flag(void)
                printf("Error - process did not run ok with --no-huge flag\n");
                return -1;
        }
-       if (launch_proc(argv2) == 0) {
-               printf("Error - process run ok with --no-huge and -m flags\n");
+       if (launch_proc(argv2) != 0) {
+               printf("Error - process did not run ok with --no-huge and -m 
flags\n");
                return -1;
        }
 #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_BSDAPP
-- 
1.9.3

Reply via email to