Marvin/Waterman Could you help to check if l3fwd is good enough for all cases (1g/10/40g, PF and VF, single queue/multiple queue)? We aim to remove l3fwd-vf to reduce an example application which is not so necessary. Thank you!
Regards, Helin > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:30 AM > To: Zhang, Helin > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example > > 2015-07-14 14:50, Zhang, Helin: > > From: Wu, Jingjing > > > Because VF multi-queues can be supported, l3fwd can run on vf. > > > Suggest to remove the l3fwd-vf example. > > Totally agree with this! > > But we need the confirmation from validation guys of that l3fwd works > > quite well on VF with all NICs (e.g. i350, 82599, x550, xl710, and fm10k). > > Helin, any new from validation?
