2015-08-03 17:02, Zhang, Helin: > I don't think so, as l3fwd cannot support all cases quite well at this moment. > Can we targeting to do that in R2.2?
OK, thanks > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 9:55 AM > > To: Zhang, Helin > > Cc: Liu, Yong; Cao, Waterman; dev at dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example > > > > Any news? > > Can we remove it from version 2.1? > > > > 2015-07-22 14:51, Zhang, Helin: > > > Marvin/Waterman > > > > > > Could you help to check if l3fwd is good enough for all cases (1g/10/40g, > > > PF and > > VF, single queue/multiple queue)? > > > We aim to remove l3fwd-vf to reduce an example application which is not so > > necessary. > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Helin
