On 1/15/21 12:10 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> The vhost header files were missing definitions from headers to allow
> them to be compiled up individually.
> 
> Fixes: d7280c9fffcb ("vhost: support selective datapath")
> Fixes: a49f758d1170 ("vhost: split vDPA header file")
> Fixes: 939066d96563 ("vhost/crypto: add public function implementation")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa.h         | 2 ++
>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa_dev.h     | 1 +
>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_crypto.h | 7 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa.h b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa.h
> index f074ec0c4a..1437f400bf 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>   * Device specific vhost lib
>   */
>  
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
>  /** Maximum name length for statistics counters */
>  #define RTE_VDPA_STATS_NAME_SIZE 64
>  
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa_dev.h b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa_dev.h
> index a60183f780..bfada387b0 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa_dev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vdpa_dev.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  #include <stdbool.h>
>  
>  #include "rte_vhost.h"
> +#include "rte_vdpa.h"
>  
>  #define RTE_VHOST_QUEUE_ALL UINT16_MAX
>  
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_crypto.h 
> b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_crypto.h
> index c809c46a21..2a27a35892 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_crypto.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost_crypto.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,13 @@
>  #ifndef _VHOST_CRYPTO_H_
>  #define _VHOST_CRYPTO_H_
>  
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <rte_compat.h>
> +
> +/* pre-declare structs to avoid including full headers */
> +struct rte_mempool;
> +struct rte_crypto_op;
> +
>  #define VHOST_CRYPTO_MBUF_POOL_SIZE          (8192)
>  #define VHOST_CRYPTO_MAX_BURST_SIZE          (64)
>  #define VHOST_CRYPTO_MAX_DATA_SIZE           (4096)
> 

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

Reply via email to