> -----Original Message-----
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 3:20 AM
> To: tho...@monjalon.net; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>;
> Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech>
> Cc: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>; Phil Yang
> <phil.y...@arm.com>; vcchu...@amazon.com; Dharmik Thakkar
> <dharmik.thak...@arm.com>; jerinjac...@gmail.com;
> hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ajit Khaparde (ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com)
> <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>; ferruh.yi...@intel.com; abo...@pensando.io;
> dev@dpdk.org; nd <n...@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15 11/12] build: add Arm SoC meson option
>
> <snip>
> >
> > 20/01/2021 02:04, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:52:19PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > 19/01/2021 15:56, Juraj Linkeš:
> > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> > > > > > > 15/01/2021 14:26, Juraj Linkeš:
> > > > > > > > --- a/meson_options.txt
> > > > > > > > +++ b/meson_options.txt
> > > > > > > > +option('arm_soc', type: 'string', value: '',
> > > > > > > > + description: 'Specify if you want to build for a
> > > > > > > > +particular
> > > > > > > > +aarch64 Arm SoC when building on an aarch64 machine.')
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why the option is named "arm_soc" and not just "soc"?
> > > > > > > The same option could be used by other archs, isn't it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Agree that a more generic name would be better.
> > > > > > I'll change it to "soc" if there are no other suggestions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another name could be "machine".
> > > > > Should it be the same mechanism as compiling for a specific x86
> > > > > CPU from an x86 machine?
> > > > >
> > > > I'd rather not re-use the term "machine", for a new use, better to
> > > > use a new term IMHO.
> > > +1, agree. 'soc' sounds good to me.
> >
> > Another possible word is "platform",
> > as in http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/platform/index.html
> I am fine with 'platform' too.
>
'platform' is likely the best and actually works nicely with
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/85956/. Taken together, 'platform' could be
either 'native', 'generic' or an soc, which is, I believe, exactly what we want.
