On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 4:03 PM Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote: > > When we're attaching fbarrays in secondary processes, we check for > whether the intended memory address for the fbarray is already in use by > some other, local fbarray. However, the check for end-overlap (i.e. to > see if our memory area's end overlaps with some other fbarray) is > incorrectly counting end offset as part of the overlap. Fix the check. > > Fixes: 5b61c62cfd76 ("fbarray: add internal tailq for mapped areas") > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> Tested-by: Zhihong Peng <zhihongx.p...@intel.com>
Applied. -- David Marchand