06/10/2020 00:41, Thomas Monjalon: > 15/09/2020 16:47, Stephen Hemminger: > > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote: > > > On 9/15/2020 3:03 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > Vdev_netvsc has been around for several years. It no longer needs > > > > to be marked experimental. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > > > > --- > > > > -Microsoft vdev_netvsc - EXPERIMENTAL > > > > +Microsoft vdev_netvsc > > > > M: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com> > > > > F: drivers/net/vdev_netvsc/ > > > > F: doc/guides/nics/vdev_netvsc.rst > > > > > > As far as I remember 'vdev_netvsc' was interim solution until 'netvsc' > > > was ready. In this patchset 'netvsc' is also becoming mature. > > > > > > Wouldn't be easier to keep 'vdev_netvsc' experimental to be able to > > > remove it soon? > > > > Let me discuss with Long Li and management. > > Maybe replace EXPERIMENTAL with DEPRECATED in 20.11. > > Would be strange to switch from experimental to deprecated :) > > +Cc Matan > > I think you still need this platform driver (with failsafe and tap) > in case you need rte_flow. Or is it well supported with netvsc PMD?
No update... I classify this patch as rejected.
