<snip> > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:45 PM Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Thanks for working on this. Sadly, I think we will have to abandon > > Travis soon - given the new changes it is looking very awful. Robot > > already is starved for job time. I am looking at [1], is DPDK not considered as open source project?
[1] https://blog.travis-ci.com/oss-announcement > > > > Since we don't have ARM test runs, I guess we will have to rely on > > something else for that coverage now, but I like that there is > > coverage included at least to compile. > > For ARM test runs, UNH is a good candidate but nothing prevents other ARM > based CI from being added. Is it possible to keep Travis CI for Arm? > > > > I will need to update the robot to pull information from github > > actions, so for now it will need to be manually checked (but here's an > > example of a run: > > https://github.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/actions/runs/382073265). What's nice is > the robot is already primed to run the jobs, so that's good. Is there any guarantee that GitHub actions will be free forever? > > Thanks. > I added a bookmark to https://github.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/actions for now. > > > -- > David Marchand
