The ID 0xEC21 is not associated with LLQ feature of the device, so it
would be misleading for the user. Because of that, the current
identifier is more precise.
Together with code update, the documentation was changed to reflect
current changes
Signed-off-by: Michal Krawczyk <m...@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Chauskin <igo...@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Guy Tzalik <gtza...@amazon.com>
---
doc/guides/nics/ena.rst | 2 +-
drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst b/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst
index 3312acba52..d7fe32c340 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Supported ENA adapters
Current ENA PMD supports the following ENA adapters including:
* ``1d0f:ec20`` - ENA VF
-* ``1d0f:ec21`` - ENA VF with LLQ support
+* ``1d0f:ec21`` - ENA VF RSERV0
Supported Operating Systems
---------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c
index ad593c882c..b1c215b63e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c
@@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ static const struct ena_stats ena_stats_rx_strings[] = {
/** Vendor ID used by Amazon devices */
#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMAZON 0x1D0F
/** Amazon devices */
-#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENA_VF 0xEC20
-#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENA_LLQ_VF 0xEC21
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENA_VF 0xEC20
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENA_VF_RSERV0 0xEC21
#define ENA_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK (\
PKT_TX_L4_MASK | \
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static const struct ena_stats ena_stats_rx_strings[] = {
static const struct rte_pci_id pci_id_ena_map[] = {
{ RTE_PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMAZON, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENA_VF) },
- { RTE_PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMAZON, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENA_LLQ_VF) },
+ { RTE_PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMAZON, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENA_VF_RSERV0) },
{ .device_id = 0 },
};
--
2.25.1
