> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 6:06 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> akhil.go...@nxp.com
> Cc: david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] app/bbdev: add explicit check for counters
> 
> 
> On 10/23/20 4:42 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > Adding explicit check in ut that the stats counters have the expect
> > values. Was missing for coverage.
> 
> missing from coverage
> 
> ?

This was causing code coverage gap. 

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Aidan Goddard <aidan.godd...@accelercomm.com>
> > Acked-by: Dave Burley <dave.bur...@accelercomm.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > index 3554a77..b62848e 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > @@ -4840,6 +4840,23 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
> active_device *ad,
> >                     (double)(time_st.deq_max_time * 1000000) /
> >                     rte_get_tsc_hz());
> >
> > +   struct rte_bbdev_stats stats = {0};
> Other calls to get_bbdev_queue_stats do not initialize stats and likely should
> > +   get_bbdev_queue_stats(ad->dev_id, queue_id, &stats);
> Should check the return here.
> > +   if (op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC) {
> 
> This logic seems off.
> 
> Do you mean to check only enc stats with an enc op ?
> 
> Similar for dec.

No that is intentional. That check would not be relavent for the LDPC_DEC tests 
as this may run more operations for the sake of HARQ preloading/retrieve. 

> 
> > +           TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(stats.enqueued_count !=
> num_to_process,
> > +                           "Mismatch in enqueue count %10"PRIu64"
> %d",
> > +                           stats.enqueued_count, num_to_process);
> > +           TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(stats.dequeued_count !=
> num_to_process,
> > +                           "Mismatch in dequeue count %10"PRIu64"
> %d",
> > +                           stats.dequeued_count, num_to_process);
> > +   }
> > +   TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(stats.enqueue_err_count != 0,
> > +                   "Enqueue count Error %10"PRIu64"",
> > +                   stats.enqueue_err_count);
> > +   TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(stats.dequeue_err_count != 0,
> > +                   "Dequeue count Error (%10"PRIu64"",
> > +                   stats.dequeue_err_count);
> > +
> >     return TEST_SUCCESS;
> >  #endif
> >  }

Reply via email to